Heed the Warning Signs

#226, November 21, 2007

 

Some warning signs are humorous, like the one by the hotel room iron: “Do not iron clothes while wearing” (c’mon guys, don’t tell me you haven’t been tempted!). Or the label on the can of pepper spray: “May irritate eyes.” This Halloween, I was a warning sign of a sort. I sprayed and tinted my hair into flames, painted my face as a globe with melting icecaps and vast hurricanes, carried around a book with pictures of Katrina called “If I Did It.” I wasn’t going for funny – more like “scariest”, or “most original”. But most observers were bewildered. One guessed, “Explosion in a Paint Factory?”

 

Not all warning signs, no matter how expressed, are so clear or so compelling as to change our behavior. Think about it. Our cerebral circuitry for detecting danger evolved when the hazards were obvious, like the large predator threatening to drag away our toddler, or another acorn moon with no acorns to harvest. Today, the dangers are mostly of human origin, and they are complex, and growing in number. Often, they are disguised. Consider Aqua Dots, the must-have kids toy which, thanks to an ingredient substitution by a greedy subcontractor, came coated with GHB, the date rape drug. Didn’t see that one coming!

 

Then there’s the tragedy of the Cosco Busan, the China-bound freighter which spilled its oily guts into San Francisco Bay. The pilot (and Petaluma resident) who was steering the ship was well qualified and apparently attentive, but the ship’s instruments gave him misleading signals. Combine equipment problems with a language barrier, blinding fog, a great deal of intertia, toxic liquid in a single layered shell, and a delicate natural system with a tide-powered circulation pump… you’ve got a formula for the disaster we’ve witnessed. No worm for this oily bird.

 

Complex and hidden threats require more sophisticated detection systems. They require the ability to sift through mountains of input, to separate the significant messages from the noise, to recognize patterns. When you put your ear to the global danger-scope, it’s nothing if not noisy. The internet, as valuable a source of info as it is, is an ocean of noise, where anyone can publish anything about everything. Even the newspaper might be called the “noisepaper”, for the choice and placement of the stories. Occasionally one can discern the bigger picture, like the day the PD had front-of-section photographs of the carbon-colored waters of the Bay and carbon-tinted skies above Santa Rosa. Did you notice that?

 

Too often, however, the news we need to know is buried. I was wrapping my harvest of green tomatoes in sheets of newspaper pulled from the recycle bin when a headline caught my eye: “U.N. Scientists detail mounting climate risks”. It was the final report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the scientific group that recently shared the Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore. “Synthesizing reams of data from its previous three reports, the IGCC for the first time specifically points out important risks that had been buried in technical data: melting of ice sheets that could lead to a rapid rise in sea levels; the extinction of large numbers of species brought about by even moderate amounts of warming, on the order of 1 to 3 degrees.” Front page? No, that was reserved for Barry Bonds and an update on the convenience store murder. The imminent destruction of the earth earned a spot on A-13.

 

Are we irretrievably losing perspective on what’s important? Are we lost in the fog of corporate propaganda and Rapture prophecy? In one of my all-time favorite movie scenes, Indiana Jones is racing down a hill, a whole tribe of head hunters on his heels. Indy calls out to his pontoon plane pilot to start the engines, but the pilot hesitates – after all, he’s got a big fish on the line! But it doesn’t take long for the pilot to get his priorities straight, and Indy survives to finish the film and at least 2 sequels.

 

I hope we do too.